Having lived in Germany until 1989 I am not a ‘native speaker’. A few months ago I got acquainted with a new term when I was made aware that Gustav Fritzl, the notorious Austrian who held his daughter captive in the basement for 20 years and made her bear 7 children, could have been become a ‘Patsy’ in the assassination of Swedish Prime Minister Olaf Palme. Ole Dammegard provides the narrative having specifically moved to Stockholm to investigate the matters:
This ‘conspiracy theory’ features TWO clandestine authority operations with Fritzl targeted to become a patsy by one of them with another person becoming a patsy in the end.
What is a patsy?
Google suggests: ‘A person who is easily taken advantage of, especially by being cheated or blamed for something.’
I have come to believe over the last 5 years that there are many patsies in the UK (in)justice system who are victims of ‘vested interests’ and unfair authority processes so feel that another definition holds more stock:
patsy. scapegoat. red herring. person accused of a something as a cover for a bigger more elaborate crime. Oswald was a patsy in the Kennedy assassination.
There we have another ‘conspiracy theory’! Apparently the term was coined to discredit those who doubted the ‘authority narrative’ of this assassination. By now the Internet is full of ‘conspiracy theories’ and the topic itself has become the subject of academic study. An article by Stef Aupers (2012) ‘Trust no one’ in the European Journal of Communication provides a handy overview of some ‘key conspiracy theories’ that I advise readers to critically engage with – if nothing else to sharpen critical reasoning skills and sharpen own insights into the world.
Abstract Popular conspiracy theories, like those about JFK, the attacks of 9/11, the death of Princess Diana or the swine flu vaccination, are generally depicted in the social sciences as pathological, irrational and, essentially, anti-modern. In this contribution it is instead argued that conspiracy culture is a radical and generalized manifestation of distrust that is embedded in the cultural logic of modernity and, ultimately, produced by processes of modernization. In particular, epistemological doubts about the validity of scientific knowledge claims, ontological insecurity about rationalized social systems like the state, multinationals and the media; and a relentless ‘will to believe’ in a disenchanted world – already acknowledged by Adorno, Durkheim, Marx and Weber – nowadays motivate a massive turn to conspiracy culture in the West.
Aupers picks up on the term ‘Conspirituality’ coined by Ward & Voas (2011) and quote from page 108 ‘The growing middle ground position of ‘conspirituality’, Ward and Voas explain, however, ‘appears to be a means by which political cynicism is tempered with spiritual optimism’.
My interest in the topic stems from the chilling case that I have been investigating since May 2012 where a mother who had escaped from an intergenerational abuse family and her toddler were made ‘patsies’. A family member seemingly ‘bumped off’ the boy’s half-aunt, his nursery teacher’s friend and his godmother in order to stage with impunity an ‘unbelievable’ day time sexual assault for the purpose of ‘Child Smuggling’. I covered the case on 23rd April 2016 at the ‘Children screaming to be heard’ conference with slides downloadable from my blog:
As the video recording for a planned documentary on Child Snatching was technically unsatisfactory I presented the same slides once more on 30st September 2016 at a Trauma Workshop in North London covering more of the organised crime background:
The first hour is presented by a Counselling Psychologist who has been providing services for more than 20 years to individuals who experienced ‘extreme abuse’. Next is my presentation. This is followed by Austrian Magister Andrea Sadegh.
Andrea Sadegh & ‘Luki’
Andrea was born in Austria – the country that gave to the world Mozart, Adolf Hitler, Arnold Schwarzenegger (who became the Governor of California – a role previously held by Ronald Reagan) and Felix Baumgartner. The small country rose to prominence in August 2006 when 18 year old Natascha Kampusch emerged having not been seen since March 1998:
There are rumblings that Natasha’s mother ‘sold’ her into abuse. It is disturbing how a specialist for finding ‘missing people’ was persecuted for putting such a theory forward at the time of her disappearance. Recently a review of the ‘suicide’ death of the kidnapper Wolfgang Priklopil centred on sensational claims that he was murdered (i.e. ‘suicided’) before his body was placed on the railway tracks. Two eminent coroners investigating the case believe Priklopil’s death was ‘not investigated to acceptable forensic standards’ by police and that he may have been killed before the train decapitated him. They declared that medical and legal reports concluding that Priklopil’s death was suicide were ‘worthless’. A former president of the Supreme Court of Vienna, who was involved in previous inquiries into the truth about the Kampusch case, agrees there are ‘serious doubts’ about whether the kidnapper killed himself. Early suspicions about Ernst Holzapfel’s involvement in the kidnapping were originally compounded by the fact that he was allowed into the house where Natascha had been held just hours after Priklopil had supposedly committed suicide. Claiming that he went there to pick up tools, he has since been accused of removing computers and images of Natascha that would have implicated him in her captivity.
Less than 2 years later another disturbing case emerged as per Wiki entry:
‘The Fritzl case emerged in April 2008 when a woman named Elisabeth Fritzl (born 6 April 1966) told police in the town of Amstetten, Austria, that she had been held captive for 24 years behind eight locked doors in a concealed corridor part of the basement area of the large family house by her father, Josef Fritzl (born 9 April 1935), and that Fritzl had physically assaulted, sexually abused, and raped her numerous times during her imprisonment. The abuse by her father resulted in the birth of seven children; four of whom joined their mother in captivity (one dying just days after birth), while the other three were raised by Fritzl and his wife, Rosemarie, having been reported as foundlings.’
Local authorities failed to realise that Fritzl had been convicted of rape and had spent time in prison. They meekly accepted explanations of three ‘foundlings’ ostensibly left by his daughter. How about some critical thinking and DNA testing?
Humans are capable of all sort of things. However mental health professionals are quick to dismiss disclosures citing archaic Freudian and (Neo)Kraeplinian ‘theories’ that seemingly have been developed to obscure the true origins of mental health issues (which are frequently neglect and abuse in early child hood) and deploy them to obfuscate persecution and outright criminality.
A third case of such nature ‘in the making’ is the case of Andrea Sadegh and a child called ‘Luki’ whose disclosures were indicative that he was being abused while on unsupervised custody visits to his father (of Persian origin). Her investigations suggest an extreme abuse ring with 60 alleged abusers/helpers. Initial research efforts failed to return meaningful explanations for the boy’s behaviours. However since hearing about dissociative disorders (formerly referred to as Multiple Personality disorder’) she has become one of the leading expert-by-experience researchers in the field. The case story and slides on mind control techniques can be found here:
Leading academics in the medical field seem to be involved in the abuse group and nobody is prepared to authorise or conduct the kind of psychological assessment required to establish dissociative features.
I had similar difficulties sourcing information about extreme abuse trauma and getting professionals to conduct and write assessment reports as outlined in my first ever paper (at ESTD 2014 conference in Copenhagen) on abuse and mental health assessment issues:
Note how Lacter& Lehmann (2008) warn (see slide26) that ‘Reports of mind control methods, espionage operations, and spiritual or psychic experiences not in the clinician’s experience should not be the basis for a diagnosis of Schizophrenia’, since: a, most clinicians are not authorities on these complex subjects, b, some abusers program bizarre beliefs (e.g., alien abduction) in victims to make them feel and appear non-credible or insane, and, c, Extreme posttraumatic stress from ritual abuse or trauma-based mind control can cause irrational fears and beliefs, especially if victims socially isolate and/or obtain information from unreliable sources, and, in severe cases, can result in acute or chronic traumatic stress reactive psychosis.’
I would add to this that vested interests in secret organisations tend to ‘stage’ events (misdirection, stalking, harassment, defamation, sexual assault in ‘unusual’ circumstances e.g. sex magick https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_magic) that are designed to appear ‘unbelievable’ and allow inadequate psychological assessments to draw negative conclusions.
In the case of Andrea Sadegh for instance vested interests managed to ‘spike’ tobacco that arrived by mail order with hallucinogenic drugs! She was told: “If you dare to mention the names of the powerful people in the group, we will have you committed to a psychiatric asylum. You, for the first time in your life, have to shut up and crawl.” She received death threats – that she would die either “instantaneously,” “by cancer,” “by a car accident,” through “psychiatric treatment” or by the use of “invisible weapons.” The same, she was told, could happen to ‘Luki’. She temporarily fled to the UK and Switzerland.
An interesting example of ‘framing’ someone to appear ‘insane’ can be found in the 1944 movie ‘Gaslight’:
In the UK the relevant SCID-D interview to assesses dissociative symptoms can be conducted by Remy Aquarone, former President of the European Society for Trauma and Dissociation’ (ESTD) at the Pottergate Centre in Norwich. In the ‘Kingston Terminator’ Child Smuggling Case (see below) solicitors representing the mother refused to challenge the inadequate Psych assessment reports of the ‘Court Appointed Experts’ and refused the offer of a privately commissioned assessment. A SCID-D assessment report was nevertheless produced that contradicted the ‘Hired Guns’ who willingly perpetuated the ‘myth’ that police, medics and social workers in the Welsh ‘MAPPA’ cabal had dreamed up to cover up the blatant, brazen and brutal ‘Child Smuggling’ operation. ‘Legal Aid’ funded solicitor and Council representatives also concealed historical intelligence test records that would have explained the mother’s neurodiversity issues including ‘Dyslexia’ and ‘Twice Exceptional’ ability pattern where high IQ was coupled with very poor auditory memory:
‘Nena’ & ‘Elwood’
The mother in this case is not related to the German woman who was singing about ‘99 Red Balloons’ in the 1980’ies. She stems from a country east of the current borders of Austria. After separating from her first husband trouble loomed when falling in love with an attractive, charming man and quickly becoming pregnant. The father of the child seemingly had little interest in pregnancy, wellbeing of mother and looking after baby and mother. Little money was available and a disproportionate amount was spent on nice clothes for him and his tennis. Understandably they separated soon. However from age 2 onwards the father claimed and was granted through the Family Court system unsupervised access. For many years the child seemingly enjoyed the weekends with his dad. A few years ago enthusiasm waned and there were increasing signs of possible sexual abuse. Medical examinations proved inconclusive (72h after buggery there would be no ‘proof’) and the lack of proof was over time ‘turned’ against the mother like if it ‘disproved’ her concerns.
Unfortunately this sorry tale I have heard several times now. Mothers who raise concerns about possible sexual abuse by the estranged father are systematically silenced and accused that listening to disclosures constitutes ‘emotional abuse’. The method is succinctly described in the book ‘When his eyes turned white’ by retired teacher Catherine Ni Mhuillin (2014) who kindly gave me permission to upload the book to this blog:
World-Wide Pattern Followed in Court Licensed Abuse Cases
- Child discloses abuse, usually sexual abuse. Law enforcement does substandard investigation. Says there is not enough evidence to give to D.A. and closes the case. Child Protective Services does a substandard investigations, labels it unsubstantiated and shunts it into family court as a custody case.
- Family Court Judge appoints insider children’s attorney and / or psychologists to shift blame to the mother by fraudulently reporting that she is a liar / alienator and / or mentally ill and recommend custody to the father, who they opine is the ‘friendly parent’.
- Judge minimises, disregards and conceals evidence of abuse, finds the mother to be lying / alienating or mentally ill and gives custody to the abusive father.
- Judge isolates children from the mother and anyone who might support the truth about the abuse while they are Stockholmed and brainwashed by the abuser, a ‘reunification / deprogramming therapist’, or an out-of-state camp, into forgetting about or recanting the abuse and agreeing to live with the abusive father.
- Judge places mother on supervised visitation where neither she nor the children are allowed to speak of abuse, past or present. Supervision monitors report to the court if either speaks of the abuse and end the visits if they do.
- Judge makes orders that prohibit children from seeing professionals who may support their disclosures, prohibits mother from taking children to doctors or therapists, and gives the perpetrator control over who they see.
- Judge gag orders the mother so the public cannot hear about the abuse or the cover up of abuse and threatens that she will not see her children again if she does not remain silent and go along with the cover up.
- Judge disempowers the mother by bankrupting her through the legal process, traumatising her through separation form her children, and enabling the abuse to continue.
Dr Lynne Wrennell, Senior Lecturer in Criminology at Liverpool John Moores University, who inspired Catherine to write this book, wrote an excellent article about the ‘Trojan Horse’ nature of so-called ‘Child Protection’ and features in some You Tube videos:
This paper belongs to an embryonic body of scholarship that documents the camouflaging of political, economic and commercial agendas under the rhetoric of Child Protection. The Trojan Horse theory of Child Protection, as this scholarship may broadly be termed, alleges the misuse of Child Protection powers for ulterior motives. Years of struggle against the Law and Order, Psychiatric and other discourses have won a raft of Civil and Human Rights protections. Bypassing these protections, Child Protection provides a rhetoric that disguises surveillance and disarms opposition, because a justifiable and apparently benign pretext has been found in the ostensible and entirely laudable, aim of protecting children. The paper collates widespread evidence of how the pretext of Child Protection has been used to extend surveillance and disarm populations. Through the discourse of Child Protection, children are propelled through various constructions from ‘child in need’, to ‘child at risk’, to ‘potentially delinquent’, to ‘delinquent’, but in each case, transgressions of ever more restrictive and constantly morphing laws, regulations and expectations are used to infiltrate techniques of information gathering deeper into more intimate parts of the social body. Child Protection is now used to penetrate where orthodox policing can no longer go. Throughout the process of criminalisation, whether children are constructed as victim or transgressor, pretexts for expanding power and increasing profit are developed. Transgression by, or against, children, is used to further the economic, political and commercial interests in surveillance. To fully understand the relationship between surveillance and Child Protection, it is necessary to interrogate the information-sharing model that is built into the major Child Protection frameworks. The paper explores the manner in which Child Protection has been structured by the information- sharing model, to benefit the sectional interests in surveillance and the detrimental consequences that this has for children and young people.
I discussed the case of ‘Nena’ and ‘Elwood’ through correspondence with an ‘expert-by-experience’.
X: I have gone through each point you made as that felt best – tuning to the child and the mother and the SS. The moment I read your mail, I knew this is the most important thing – in law:
<Ed: Tammy Stefano interviewing retired US Detective Dan Scott>
‘When you allege child abuse, child protective services take over and investigate child abuse referrals. This show explains that social workers have a role but it’s NOT to investigate the crime of child abuse in fact, it’s the police that are OBLIGATED to investigate child abuse because child abuse is a CRIME! This wonderful guest tells us why and explains how parents can enforce Law Enforcement to investigate. Social workers are NOT investigators for crimes. Report child abuse Crimes to the Sheriffs or Police Department first!’
RK: As the boy gained confidence he started to disclose more.
X: Yes, once children gain your trust they do disclose bit by bit. From observing them they watch like hawks for the smallest sign that they are not being believed and withdraw back into their shells.
RK: When disclosing some matter to Social Services they simply claimed the mother had coached him to say these things and threatened long-term foster care.
X: Yes, this is always the pattern – blame the mother and then the matter is put to bed.
Yes – threaten the child with long term care – punished for telling the truth and sent away. Gosh do they never learn how destructive they are.
This is used in PAS <Ed: Parental Alienation Syndrome> cases – Charles Pragnell did some great work on that.
RK: Last week disclosures to mother and boyfriend included anal intercourse and oral sex with biological father.
X: How difficult that must have been for that child. It’s not something a child makes up. Child is clearly seeking safety and protection and trusts mother.
Was the child brought to police and medically checked?
Now child will feel he got his mother into trouble and it’s all his fault. Both child and mother are being punished…so chances are he will not say much more. He will have lost trust in social services forever.
RK: When the mother informed SS they decided to make her boy stay with a friend for one night, and later fabricated lies to claim that the mother was in a ‘bad state’ – which is entirely untrue.
X: Mother informed in good faith believing crime would be investigated.
If she had not disclosed she would also be guilty of failure to protect. Catch 22.
This is so typical and criminal. It’s all a set up and it’s their word against the mother.
So when did SS investigate this crime?
When did they pass the criminal case over to police?
The mother would not be in a bad state if she was fabricating it. Would she?
However, if the mother was in a bad state – could it be from the trauma of her child disclosing the sexual abuse crimes. You know where I am going here. Agree and then make the point.
Just remembering when I learned of my child’s sexual abuse, I was unable to speak for 3 days- shock and trauma.
RK: This Thursday a 2 week holiday with the father was coming up.
On Tuesday SS told mother that they are taking her to court on Wednesday.
They demanded from the judge that mother’s access to son is limited to ‘supervised only’ due to risk of emotional harm and ostensibly Borderline Personality Disorder.
X: Again identical pattern.
My judge friend told me “it’s all to do with father’s rights, resulting in things being 100 times worse for child sexual abuse victims than 20 years ago”.
Supervised access means the child will not be allowed to mention anything about abuse and is silenced now.
Detrimental to his well-being.
Social workers are not trained psychiatrists, so how did they diagnose the mother?
It’s their usual pattern and no one challenges them by asking them to CLARIFY how they reached their conclusion.
I also learned this from the Judge who never lost a case as solicitor.
RK: They asked for no restrictions whatsoever on father even when acknowledging he failed to complete requested drug tests and sent threatening messages to SS.
Yes, this is the usual pattern here too. One set of standards for abusers and another for mothers and children.
If he threatened SS then he is well capable of threatening the child and anyone else involved.
Why did SS not prosecute him for threatening them?
Are they accepting it as acceptable behaviour? Have they no respect for themselves?
So there is a drugs issue too? How then can the child be placed with such an adult for 2 weeks unsupervised? How is that protecting the child?
This case concerns an Austrian citizen and seems to be about asset stripping of elderly people, whistleblowing and reprisals. From what I gather ‘vested interests’ took over the house of his mother in Yorkshire and shunted her into a care home:
During his time in Germany decades ago reportedly British Army Police (!) turned up to harass him – seemingly on unlawful orders of another family member using clandestine channels.
Surprise, surprise with this kind of background – 6969 (sic) pornographic images were ‘discovered’ on an old computer that he seemingly had no access to for quite a while:
I understand that he recently got released from prison one day at 6pm in the evening – without warning or preparation. He apparently made it to the home of a kind McKenzie friend and stayed there for a week.
On Thursday 10 November 2016 Peter was facing extradition to Austria, where he has been ‘sectioned’ in the face of a psychiatric report, which confirms he is perfectly sane.
Working together with Grandma B’s abusers, the Austrian police and judiciary want Peter out of the way to:
1) Silence him
2) To prevent him from stopping them fraudulently selling his house in Austria, where he and his mother “Grandma B” spent several years in exile from their home in York.
Like in Britain, the misuse of mental health laws by corrupt judges is commonplace.
Susanne Kellner Johnson
Another Austrian activist who has been facing persecution by Psychiatrists is Susanne Kellner Johnson – looks like another ‘Child Smuggling’ operation:
She described how her bathroom door was broken down by police on the orders of a psychiatrist, how she was taken from her bath, strapped to a trolley and taken to the hospital by force.
“To this day I do not know why I was sectioned,” she said. “Yet the hospital management has continuously refused to divulge any information regarding the circumstances of my forced detention.”
And she now faces a huge legal bill after having to fight for custody of her young daughter, who was taken into care.
“Nobody will ever be able to erase the horror, terror and fear from myself and my daughter’s memories,” she added.
Sources told me the following background:
Originally Susanne’s ex-husband wanted to have their house, but Susanne refused to move away, and since Susanne’s ex had committed sexual abuse on the 3-year-old child, who Susanne told me told her mother at that time which was 19 years ago, Susanne sought sole custody of the child, and was granted it in court.
Susanne’s ex sought out his psychiatrist Dr. A. to section Susanne which he did. This was back in 1997. That’s when Susanne’s troubles began.
The child was placed into foster care as far as I can recall.
The reason I feel that Susanne is held now is twofold. One she is a threat to Big Pharma due to her holistic therapy practice, and 2) she is a threat to the powers-the-be due to her human rights activism.
In 2009 she managed to post on the site of Veteran campaigner Maurice Kirk (currently flying in a vintage plane rally across Africa):
Key is her background:
‘I am a psychic, healer and Shaman, if I live, I live, if not, I die.’
Proclaiming psychic capabilities is anathema to Psychiatrists. It is just not allowed as it threatens the ‘status quo’ – the narrow-minded totalitarian view of mainstream Psychiatry that colludes with authorities and disempowers individuals. No interest in ‘healing’ – just ‘control’. And no interest in the abuse, neglect and trauma in early childhood that at times leads to psychic capabilities.
It is informative to look at the arbitrary abuse of power she is subjected to:
It has just come to my attention that the police, according to TalkTalk my telephone service provider, had instructed them to cease supplying me with their services. This apparently happened on 16 June and I recently received a bill from TalkTalk demanding a £70.00 cessation fee. I had been ringing them for a week to find out what was going on as I had not cancelled anything at all and was completely unaware as to what was happening. I was now told over the phone on 21 July by TalkTalk that the police had instructed them to stop my service provision. TalkTalk refused to give me any further information on this issue and told me to contact the police. I have now written to TalkTalk to demand a full explanation in writing so that I can take the matter further.
What right has the police in the UK got to interrupt the only line of communication of a foreign individual who relies on her phone to maintain contact with her family in Austria, her friends, clients and professional contacts? What sinister game are they playing, and who gives them the right to simply instruct a telephone service provider to cease supply to individuals? And why does the individual concerned not get any notification of this happening at all, and why on earth should the individual concerned be made to pay a cessation fee to the service provider if the police cancel their service in the first place?
It is blatantly clear to me that there are no civil liberties and no human rights in this country. The police can do what they want and get away with it. I also just received a so called ‘police investigation report’, which once again is full of serious flaws. North Yorkshire Police is once again covering up a forced entry into my premises in March, and once again claiming a S136 arrest in the street, when in fact, they had stormed into my house, both front and back simultaneously and are lying about it. Unfortunately for them I actually have a witness who saw them do it. I trust that you may be able to shed some light on the clandestine activities of the local police force and their sinister attempts to prevent me from contacting anyone at all, as well as their attempts to constantly hide the fact that they are acting against the law. It is also clear that they are constantly trying to provoke, terrorise and threaten me behind the scenes in order to get me to react to it, but I simply will not rise to the challenge. If I as much as make one angry phone call to them demanding an explanation about their attempts to cut off my phone, I will immediately be sectioned under the Mental Health Act again.
By now she managed to clock up 25 arrests, has been sectioned and threatened with yet-more HALDOL!
Chilling how authority representatives under the guise of mental health ‘concerns’ can persecute and silence activists:
These S135 warrants are a joke, they just lie to a magistrate, and the Magistrates Court does not keep copies of these warrants, they very often don’t even keep a copy on file! These warrants are not traceable and trackable. Nobody knows how many are used in the UK every year, and there is no log as to who is subjected to these S135 warrant arrests either. The police is supposed to log the execution on their computers, but that does not always happen either!
These are clear cut arbitrary arrest warrants ordered by a court of law, with the victim of the arrest not actually having access to justice or a fair trial, because it’s an ex-parte court hearing with immediate execution by the police. And they have new warrants now, who actually already specify the length of the prison sentence, such as part II of the Act, which is an immediate 28 day sentence, with forced treatment thrown in also! And the latest new version of S135 is the one for the poor victims of Community Treatment Orders, where the police is authorised to retake them and track them via their mobile phones even! Yes, under the new CTO’s the police can ping the recalled victim and track them down… There is a lot of evil in this legislation and they are subjecting me to it all. I have no doubt that by the end of the week I will find myself on a Section 3 1983 MHA, and then a Community Treatment Order so that they can enforce the forced depots in the community.
I have already told the consultant that they would have to come with the police and kick in my door and handcuff me when they come with the depots, because I will not let them in.’
Susanne is seemingly being held under section 33 of The Mental Health Act 1983 as being incapable of looking after herself. Despite her friends’ repeated attempts of asking to see a copy of the court warrant or order authorising Susanne’s detention the solicitor acting for the mental hospital where she is being detained refuses to provide a copy. To add to that he will not give them me a copy of a signed document authorising the forced depot medication of Haldol against Susanne’s wishes. This drug was apparently given to Soviet dissidents in the 1960s to make them lose their memories and will to continue with their dissident activities – which is presumably exactly the reason that they are treating Susanne in this way because she has knowledge that embarrasses the establishment. To add to these injustices she is not allowed to receive unmonitored incoming or outgoing calls and her mobile phone is being withheld from her.
Susanne is being detained at Heather Ward, Airedale Centre for Mental Health, Steeton nr Keighley, West Yorkshire, BD20 6DT, Tel. No. 01535678131
The CEO of the Bradford and District NHS Foundation Trust is Nicola Lees:
New Mill, Victoria Road, Bradford. BD18 3LD Tel. 01274 228300
Updates can be found here:
‘John’s effort to free Susanne now has caused the court to send a document in the post in which CEO Nicola Lees would be made to testify instead of what the judge wanted to have which would have forced John, as Susanne’s McKenzie friend, to have to cross examine a dead entity, namely the NHS Trust something that is impossible to cross examine. So we are making headway.
John scanned this document that the court sent and sent it off to the NHS Trust’s solicitor. That solicitor questioned that it is only one page, but John confirmed that it is only one page in his reply to the solicitor at which time John wrote words to the effect that Nicola Lees may opt to set Susanne free rather than risk her career as CEO of BDCT over the mental hospital. So time will tell.’
‘The Kingston Terminator’ Child Smuggling Case
I reluctantly use a somewhat sensationalist heading here to draw attention to the fact that authorities are continuing to shield from proper investigation a Kingston-upon-Thames resident who appears to be a serial offender. Have a look at the part-redacted document that can be downloaded below:
A toddler who resided in Kington for about 6 weeks in August-September 2010 lost in this house fire his godmother – who was found ‘on top of roof tiles’ (how come?) with ‘broken legs and broken arm’ (due to fire?). A car indicator light was found that could have come off when the godmother (who had a severe walking disability) was ‘run over’ when crossing the yard to prepare the feed for her horses. A drug bottle was found on the window sill of the bathroom. Was the injured godmother drugged with this? Strangely the autopsy did not test for drugs as ostensibly there was ‘not enough blood available’. A Red Bull can was found on site that certainly would not have been consumed by the deceased. On top of all that an older gent gave a friend of the deceased a lift ‘back up to the burning house’. Was this ‘older gent’ who seemingly blended in across the Irish Sea a Kingston resident? A resident with surprisingly darkish complexion given the Irish accent and roots – probably stemming from an Indo-Aryan community far east of Austria that travelled (sic) 1000 years ago through Persia and the Khazar kingdom. A few months ago I saw him walk his dog (a golden retriever?) at the Thames near his home. Every time I visit Waitrose in Surbiton I reminiscence about the tragic-comical anecdote about what happened in the shop opposite (before the business moved to his home).
A half-aunt of the toddler died in her prime of life in October 2010. Coincidence? Her son had been raped at age 2 (documented in authority records; boy was put on the Child Protection Register) when playing in the garden…another member of the family was buggered at age 2…
A good friend of the boy’s nursery teacher was found dead in a village river in December 2010:
A few weeks later a row of cottages went up in flames overlooking the locations where the deceased was found and where she had reportedly been arguing with the Kingston resident.
Following the three untimely death a stalking, harassment and defamation campaign ensued including an attempt to ‘mow down’ mother and toddler (another ‘dangerous driving’ incident happened reportedly around 2000 in Kingston). One incident documented in police records involved a police helicopter and two police cars intercepting the young family on a hiking trail due to malicious defamatory claims that were entirely unfounded.
In October 2011 the toddler got reportedly sexually assaulted by this Kingston resident (or a ‘look-a-like’). The mother reported the crime to local police with several weeks delay – following instructions received by a Kingston based police officer who made her promise that she would delay reporting of any sexual assault for several weeks – ostensibly to facilitate an ‘undercover investigation’. I analysed at the BDA Dyslexia conference the ‘Twice Exceptional’ ability pattern that facilitated this ‘programming’ making the mother and her toddler ‘patsies’ of vested interests:
In a poster I outlined the organised crime connections that help to understand how the mother was made to go along with the manipulation:
A bunch of mental health professionals ‘covered-up’ what happened claiming the mother was ‘delusional’. Unfortunately Psychiatrists and Psychologist acting as Court Appointed Experts seem to routinely shield wrongdoers in positions of power.
Those who watched the odd Panorama program heard the ‘Nick’ claimed to have witnessed a school boy being mowed down with a car in Kingston around 1980. In addition to the various incidents described there are various other reasons to suspect that ‘The Kingston Terminator’ was the perpetrator of that incident. However Operation Midland and whatever its successor is continue to refuse to investigate claiming it falls outside there Frame of Reference e.g. 07/06/2016:
Dear Dr Kurz
Unfortunately at this time I am unable to provide to you the TOR for Op Midland. These are for MPS knowledge only, to allow us to investigate relevant information. It maybe in due course they will become public knowledge but not at this time.
I cannot provide you with the details for CRIS 0405609/13. This is a private matter between the complainant and the police. If you have further information regarding a crime then you can of course make another third party allegation to the correct force area. If you have a complaint about the way police dealt with this allegation I suggest that your best course of action is to report to the local force. If you preferred to make an allegation to the IPCC they will then forward to the relevant force area.
With regards to an alleged linked series of murders I cannot see that there is anything at this stage to link those crimes. If you have a complaint about the way they have been investigated then I think the best way would be to go to the correct force area or the IPCC who will do this for you.
The same applies to the other allegations in respect of the Kingston Police officer and Edward Heath.
I can see that you have a considerable number of grievances with the way that a number of police forces have dealt with differing allegations. Op Midland is not the best way to deal with this. We have logged all your information, but at this time as stated none falls within the TOR for Op Midland.
On a previous occasion (12 May 2016) this ‘Operation Midland’ officer stated:
‘Further details are required, including the name of the Psychiatrist and how you know about his links to the Sadistic Violence Group, and the fact that Edward Heath was involved.’
I submitted on Sun 16/10/2016 numerous documents including a 45 page Third Party Crime Witness statement (previously ignored by two other police forces) naming the Psychiatrist who was seemingly involved in Kingston-upon-Thames shenanigans and ‘Child Smuggling’ proceedings that played out in a Court Room some 150 miles away.
No reply so far!